Consent is one of the numerous legal basis for
processing of personal data. Along consent, GDPR also distinguishes the
processing necessary for the performance of a contract, legal obligation, vital
interest, task carried out in the public interest and legitimate interest of
the organization.
GDPR does not substantially change the basic
parameters of consent. However, it widens the requirements for its acquisition.
According to the current legislation, consent to processing of personal data
was some kind of “priority” legal basis and subsequently, the exceptions were
specified when the data could be processed without consent. GDPR demolishes
this conception and puts consent on the same level as the other legal basis. It
is also recommended, while determining the legal basis, to find some of the
other legal basis, such as the performance of a contract or a legal obligation
and only in the cases when such legal basis is impossible to determine, request
consent to processing of personal data.
If for the processing of personal data, it is
impossible to determine another legal basis, take into account that the
processing of personal data based on consent is one of the most complicated
ways due to the requirements imposed by GDPR. Why?
It is clear from the word “free” itself that the
person who provides consent to processing of personal data must have a real
free choice and control. As a general rule GDPR provides that if the person
concerned does not really have a free choice and feels to be forced to consent
or can have problems arising from not consenting, consent is not valid.
Such situations may happen for instance during
requesting consent to processing of personal data by an employer from an
employee. It is unlikely that an employee would freely and without the felling
of pressure reacted to an employer’s request for consent to, for instance, the
activation of a camera monitoring system at the workplace.
From acquired consent, it must be clear for which
purpose the personal data are provided and in what scope they will be
processed. If there are more purposes of the processing of personal data,
consent must be given to all of them.
Let´s use a practical example. An operator acquires
consent to the sending of the usual commercial offers to a customer and for
this purpose acquires their email address. It can only be used for this
purpose. If the operator wants to send a personalized email offering products,
which they suppose that the customer may be more interested in, they necessarily
need specific consent of the customer.
To meet this requirement, it is necessary to provide
the person concerned with at least information about:
Provision of such information before the acquisition
of consent is important so that the person concerned can decide, understand to
what they consent and use the right for withdrawal of consent in the future.
However, the essential fact is that GDPR emphasizes
the method of compliance with the information obligation. It is necessary to
formulate the information clearly and in a plain language understandable to
anyone, not only to lawyers. Thus, it is not possible to comply with this
obligation by using long and incomprehensible sentences full of legal
terminology or to “hide” the information somewhere in the general terms and
conditions.
In relation to the provision of consent, there cannot
be any doubts about the fact that the person concerned consents to the
processing of personal data. It is not possible to acquire consent by the same
act, by which a contract is concluded, or the terms and conditions of the
operator are accepted.
In general, signing of consent in writing, ticking a
box in a paper or electronic form (so-called opt-in), expressing consent by
sending an email and similar act will be considered to be valid consent. On the
contrary, valid consent cannot be given by silence, by including consent in a
contract or by an already ticked box (so-called opt-out).
GDPR does not provide any specific form for consent to
the processing of personal data. However, acquired consent must be proved by
the operator. Therefore, the acquisition of consent orally without issuing any
confirmation, for instance in the form of an audio record, will not be
sufficient. Mainly written form is considered, while it does not have to be
only in a paper form but also in an electronic form. Consent given
electronically via logs or attributes in electronic databases are also
provable.
In case of a dispute, the burden of proof of valid
consent is on the operator.